His previous bigoted remarks have so far not caused any concern. Of course, that assumes Newsweek would have a problem with an editor openly espousing apartheid. If he answers that he accepts apartheid for Palestinians then he should be fired.
#Warlike country iseral full
What then? Would Hammer be willing to extend full voting rights to all Palestinians between the river and the sea or does he prefer ongoing apartheid? The vast majority of scholarship on the Israeli occupation, of course, strongly disagrees with Kontorovich, Bell and Hammer on the matter – as does the United Nations and even a reluctant US State Department.īut for the sake of argument, let’s propose that most scholarship didn’t uphold the reality of the occupation. He merely links to the work of well-known apologist for Israeli settlements and apartheid Eugene Kontorovich (as well as to Abraham Bell). Mehdi will never permit himself to learn actual international law on these matters, but here is your friendly reminder that the allegation of "occupation" is a straightforward, propagandistic lie.Īs explained last fall: - Josh Hammer May 11, 2021īut Hammer proves nothing in his linked article. Newsweek’s opinion editor Josh Hammer, whose bigoted history has been reported here, engaged in a new attack on Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, essentially accusing her of dual loyalty. No mention has been given to the fact that Palestinians being attacked in Gaza are largely refugees forced from homes and lands in 1948 in what is now Israel. Palestinians have stated this fact for decades and since the start of the year both Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem and Human Rights Watch have asserted this reality. Israel’s standing as practicing apartheid has been widely omitted.
#Warlike country iseral free
We heard several booms - hamas militant wing says it’s in retaliation for what’s happening in Jerusalem- Hadas Gold The New York Times, for its part, appeared wildly uninformed when it referred to Hamas launching a “surprise volley of rockets toward Jerusalem.” But there was no surprise involved.Īs my colleagues reported Monday: “The military wing of the Palestinian resistance organization Hamas issued an ultimatum giving Israel an hour – until 6 pm local time – to withdraw its forces from al-Aqsa and the occupied East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah, and free detainees.”Īs they noted: “When that deadline passed, volleys of rockets were fired toward Jerusalem.” The New York Times has a responsibility to report the full story. Red alert sirens across Israel - including in Jerusalem. Why can it not be said that Palestinian resistance groups were retaliating for Israel’s attacks on Palestinians praying at al-Aqsa mosque? Journalists and their kneejerk biases require examination.ĬNN’s Hadas Gold did accurately tweet out that Hamas said it was retaliating for Israel’s actions in Jerusalem. Mainstream media too frequently insist on a narrative in which Israel “retaliates.” The Washington Post’s timeline fraud is perhaps the clearest example to date.Įven yesterday, the narrative already was of an Israeli retaliation. That rocket fire, meanwhile, was in response to Israeli violence in Jerusalem Monday and in the days before that has seen hundreds of Palestinians wounded, some in critical condition. Most of the Palestinians were killed by Israeli air strikes prior to the Palestinian rocket that killed two Israelis. “A day of upheaval at the holy sites of this contested city quickly widened into a night of warlike violence in communities across the country Tuesday, with hundreds of rockets from the Gaza Strip resulting in the deaths of at least two Israelis and retaliatory airstrikes killing at least 26 Gazans, according to Palestinian officials and Israeli media.”īut this reverses the chronology of reality. Its opening paragraph on the latest news from Palestine claimed: The Washington Post went out of its way to mislead readers today. Mainstream media are failing Palestinians once again.
0 kommentar(er)
